Deltas Δ
The act of reflection brings to the surface what could have been done better, we call these “deltas”. If you are reading this with an intention to start an ALC (or any unschool) these are items you’ll want to look out for and prepare for.
Holding Vision
If I had to point to any one thing that could have been done better it would be identifying a vision holder early. The vision holder is a person (or group of people) who hold the vision for a project. Here are some qualities I feel make a good vision holder:
- Is a member of the ALC’s community.
- Is invested in the success of the ALC.
- Has the time and energy to invest in the ALC.
- Has a clear vision of what the ALC will become.
- Is capable of allowing that vision to change and evolve as the ALC grows.
When I came to Everett it was unclear who this person was. As the facilitator I took on much of the responsibilities that a vision holder might have:
- Coordinating parent meetings.
- Workshopping vision and mission statements.
- Building community through events.
- Growing the community through outreach.
Trying to facilitate the school and taking on these responsibilities meant that I never did a really good job of them. One example was coordination of parent meetings, I had an intention of holding a potluck followed by a parents meeting every other week. Our first parents meeting was an amazing success, we defined tasks, took on responsibilities, and defined milestones. However the next scheduled meeting passed as did deadlines. At the time, these lapses were reasonable, illness, time restrictions, and other priorities got in the way.
It wasn’t until three months later that we came back together for another potluck and meeting. This failure could have been avoided if someone, like a vision holder, had been able to keep on top of our intentions.
Facilitator Support
The fact that I didn’t make enough of an effort to hold meetings and help parents achieve their intentions points to my over-commitment in other areas. Because I was the only facilitator I was unable to perform many of these type of necessary duties.
Having only one Facilitator was a big mistake. Especially a single ALF who was not a member of the community.
My agreement was to stay for a maximum of 10 months and as such I didn’t have much “skin in the game”. Having a second facilitator, especially one who would be staying with the community, would have made a huge difference.
As an ALF I could have made my needs for support more explicit.
If you need help, the first step is to ask for help. I could have done a better job of that. At the time, though, I thought that I could handle it and in some cases, that it would burden others to ask for help.
For the month of October another ALF, Abram, joined me to facilitate ALC Everett. This was probably the most highly productive period of this short experiment. Having someone share the facilitation duties provided much needed time for me to do more administrative activities during the school day. It also provided space for self-care, if I wasn’t feeling well I could rest in bed knowing that Abe was there to run meetings and work with the students.
Even having a part-time facilitator that could come in for the entire day a few times per week would have been a great help.
So in retrospect a vision holder to build and maintain the vision for the school and two facilitators, at least one of whom is a member of the community, to manage the school’s day-to-day is probably a minimum requirement.
Communication
Miscommunication plagued ALC Everett. Part of this delta can be attributed to the agile nature of plans that come out of the Agile Learning process. Field trips and other activities that require some level of parental coordination were often planned by the students who didn’t always remember to tell their parents key pieces of information, as teens are just beginning to learn how to account of all those finer details.
Much of the communication and coordination fell to me as the facilitator. Often times I would find that I was the conduit between students and parents or between the parents themselves.
Some things that would have helped communication include:
- Holding regular meetings
- Virtually via phone, Skype, or Google Hangout
- Sending a “set the week” email to parents
- Sending a recap of reflective blog posts to parents
- Encouraging parents to read their children’s blog posts
- Making time for one-on-one sessions with parents and/or students
- Having clear communication pipelines
It isn’t that people didn’t want to communicate, I think the main issue was that people didn’t know how to effectively communicate. I don’t know if we as a community ever made clear how each of us preferred to be contacted. Even though we did have a student and parent directory along with a group email list it wasn’t clear to some parents if messages were getting out to everyone. Often people would send messages to the “all parent” email list and no one would respond. Having a simple community agreement to confirm a message was received could have alleviated this.
Working out community agreements about what needed to be communicated to whom and how would have helped a great deal.
Conflict Resolution
It’s often said that developing a conflict resolution process is best done when things are good. We never took steps to adopt a process because there was very little conflict in school. Everyone got along and things ran very smoothly.
Not having a process for resolving conflict was a big mistake.
Late in the school year there was a seemingly small conflict between the father and owner of the house where we were holding school and one of the students. As far as I know it came out of a misunderstanding of house rules and school rules. The lack of resolution around this conflict, among other reasons, led the student to leave the school and contributed to the overall dissollution of ALC Everett.
Partially this conflict arose from a misalignment between the house rules and the school rules developed through the Change Up Meetings.
This issue could have probably been avoided through greater involvement of the home-owners in the Change Up Meetings but ultimately it was the lack of any kind of resolution process that exacerbated what could have been a minor misunderstanding.
Here are a few ideas for conflict resolution processes:
Culture Committee
At the NYC ALC they use a process called Culture Committee. Anyone in the community can make a request for a Culture Committee process to start by filling out an online form. As described on the NYC ALC tools and practices page, Culture Committee:
The Culture Committee meets on a regular basis and will talk through the conflict with the requester in order to come up with an action plan. If necessary, the other party may be brought in to the meeting to facilitate the resolution.
Restorative Justice Circles
The Restorative Justice process focuses on repairing communities instead of enforcing punitive “justice”. It involves inviting affected parties into a process that allows them to share their experience and through mediated discussion come to a resolution.
More information about the process can be found at restorativejustice.org
Giving the Process Time
Learning, adapting, and practicing the ALC tool set while simultaneously building community takes a tremendous amount of time. Although a number of the Everett students and parents were introduced to the tools and practices before starting the school it took time to figure out how we were going to implement the ALC tools and practices.
7 months wasn’t nearly enough time to sow the seeds of a radical new way of educating youth and see those seeds blossom.
After a few months parents got worried about their children and if they were learning what they “needed” to learn. It’s no wonder that these fears surfaced, there are so many pressures out in the world warning us that if kids don’t get the right education they will end up in a very bad position in our society. The fact that most of the students were of high school age and thus only had a few more years to go limited the ability of parents to feel comfortable with experimenting and testing an unfamiliar system.
Were I to do this again I would make clear to parents that this is a process not a product. Students need to learn to use the kanban before they can use their kanban to effectively self-direct their education to the “useful” stuff. The community must learn how to best make offerings before the process can really work well.
A community needs time to fail before it can truly understand what works.